Argumentation and Risk Assessment

نویسندگان

  • Simon Parsons
  • John Fox
چکیده

Over the last ten years we have been involved in the development of a formal framework for decision making and reasoning under uncertainty based on "argumentation". The latter provides a way of managing uncertainty which differs from probabilistic inference and is particularly valuable in those many practical situations where uncertainty cannot be quantified. Recently we have been applying argumentation as a non-numerical method of risk assessment.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Risk Assessment as an Argumentation Game

This paper explores the idea that IT security risk assessment can be formalized as an argumentation game in which assessors argue about how the system can be attacked by a threat agent and defended by the assessors. A system architecture plus assumptions about the environment is specified as an ASPIC argumentation theory, and an argument game is defined for exchanging arguments between assessor...

متن کامل

An Argumentation Based Approach to Risk Assessment

Reliable quantitative risk assessment requires the use of meaningful statistical data and well validated models for their interpretation. In certain domains neither the data nor the validated models are available. Nevertheless, there may still be a requirement to generate a meaningful characterisation of risk, presented in a form which reflects the reliability and accuracy of the data available...

متن کامل

Risk, negotiation and argumentation—a decision support system based approach

There has been very little published research on building legal decision support systems to perform risk assessment. Yet one of the principal goals of the law is to reduce risk through the avoidance of litigation. This paper discusses ongoing research on how legal decision support systems can support risk reduction and negotiation. Toulmin’s theory of argumentation is proposed as one technique ...

متن کامل

Automated analysis of security requirements through risk-based argumentation

Computer-based systems are increasingly being exposed to evolving security threats, which often reveal new vulnerabilities. A formal analysis of the evolving threats is difficult due to a number of practical considerations such as incomplete knowledge about the design, limited information about attacks, and constraints on organisational resources. In our earlierwork onRISA (RIsk assessment in S...

متن کامل

A framework for risk analysis of maritime transportation systems: A case study for oil spill from tankers in a ship¬タモship collision

This paper proposes a framework for risk analysis of maritime transportation systems, where risk analysis is understood as a tool for argumentative decision support. Uncertainty is given a more prominent role than in the current state of art in the maritime transportation application area, and various tools are presented for analyzing uncertainty. A two-stage risk description is applied. In the...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2002